Dear Editor,

Newton’s government process looks open—but too often, it isn’t. By the time most residents learn about a proposal, the real decisions have already been shaped behind the scenes. Projects advance to committees and boards with limited public notice or input, and by the time they reach the City Council, approval feels like a foregone conclusion.

This pattern leaves residents reacting rather than participating. It also gives disproportionate influence to special interests—especially those with financial or political power—while the broader public is left out.

Inside City Hall, committees are expected to review proposals carefully, but many lack the time, independence, or information to do so. Requests for more data or public discussion are often viewed as obstruction rather than due diligence. As a result, flawed or incomplete proposals move forward instead of being sent back for further review.

Even councilors who express concern often vote in favor, creating a false consensus and eroding public trust. The culture seems to value speed and control over openness and accuracy.

What’s missing is real accountability—an independent review of how committees, commissions, and consultants function, and whether public input is truly being considered. Often only one public meeting on an issue takes place, and that is only a beginning.

Newton residents are engaged, informed, and ready to contribute. They deserve a government process that welcomes—not avoids—their participation. Good governance means asking hard questions, taking time to get things right, and ensuring transparency from start to finish.

If Newton truly values democracy, it must make room for the public voice before—not after—the decisions are made.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Carol Todreas
Newton